Strong reframing of non-coercion as a structural invariant rather than a moral imperative. The move from metaphysics to coordination mechanics sidesteps alot of the usual baggage around rights language. That said, the arbitration layer feels underspecified, how does neutral arbitration emerge when agents disagree on what counts as "imminent annihilation" without defaulting back to power?
Strong reframing of non-coercion as a structural invariant rather than a moral imperative. The move from metaphysics to coordination mechanics sidesteps alot of the usual baggage around rights language. That said, the arbitration layer feels underspecified, how does neutral arbitration emerge when agents disagree on what counts as "imminent annihilation" without defaulting back to power?
Good catch, I'm working on the arbitration layer now